My 3rd Book “Without 3 Miracles Darwin’s Dead!” is HERE.

In Charlie Liebert’s first book Always Be Ready to Give an Answer! He developed an effective personal Christian evangelism strategy to get past unbelievers questions and present the Gospel in all Christian encounters. After one of his spiritual mentors had asked, “Well, shouldn’t you answer the questions?” he wrote his second book, ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You!” It answers more than 100 questions commonly asked by unbelievers to stump or silence Christians. Charlie says: “As I was finishing ANSWERS … I realized that although I’d compared Creation and Evolution in that book, I had not shown the IMPOSSIBILITY of Atheistic Evolution. So now my third book, Without 3 Miracles Darwin’s Dead!  has the potential to change many minds about the viability of Evolution because “Science Proves Atheistic Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE!”

In bearing testimony for Christ, through my web page, and in my roles as a teacher, seminar, and workshop leader I’m often asked: “Do you believe in Evolution?” I answer: “No I don’t!” Then I get responses like: “Why not, it’s proven by science?” OR “The evidence for it is overwhelming!” OR “Only ignorant or closed-minded fundamentalists don’t believe it!”  I even get that kind of reaction from some who call themselves Christians. In “Without 3 Miracles Darwin’s Dead!”, I am taking a hard-nosed position saying to ALL who will listen; “Atheistic Evolution is scientifically impossible because it breaks three scientific LAWS.”

If you understand science you know scientific laws CAN’T remain laws if they are broken.  Evolution flagrantly violates THREE of them!  The First and Second laws of Thermodynamics and the Law of Biogenesis.   To break a scientific law, you need a miracle, and Atheistic Evolution cannot allow any because of their rejection of the supernatural.  I call these three miracles: Magic, Frankenstein, and Uphill Molasses.  Magic is the appearance of something from nothing, a violation of the First Law.  Frankenstein is the emergence of life from non-living chemicals which, violates the Law of Biogenesis which says: “life ONLY comes from life and ONLY from life of the same kind.”  The 2nd Law says the Universe is irreversibly running down.  Evolution is always gaining complexity in conflict with this law.  Adding energy to a system requires intelligently designed machines to increase complexity.  It’s like molasses running uphill against gravity.  In addition to the three required miracles, we’ll explore other issues that contribute to Evolution’s impossibility.

  • Evolution is NOT science; it’s a faith statement about the past!
  • The missing links between apes and men are ALL still missing,
  • There are some creatures whose behavior, design or incredible complexity Evolution cannot explain by natural processes.
  • The history of Evolution contains many frauds, and I’ll highlight two of them.

How do Evolution proponents address these issues? Denial, rationalization or just plain lying! They can’t answer these problems, and they know it. Science Proves Atheistic Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE!” Evolution has damaging effects on our culture and wastes resources that could be used to improve health and living conditions in the US. Millions of tax dollars are spent on evolutionary research that will NEVER bring value to humanity. It’s a waste of resources based on a lie.

Charlie is the author of “Always Be Ready to Give an Answer!  A Former Atheist’s Personal Christian Evangelism Plan.” which develops an evangelism strategy that gets to the Gospel every time you witness.  His second book ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You.” contains answers to more than 100 questions skeptics use to try to stump Christians.  http://yourchristiananswers.com  The third book, “Without 3 Miracles Darwin’s DEAD!” is available NOW @  http://w3mdarwinsdead.com

To get Charlie’s weekly blog search charlieliebert.blog

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

Contact Charlie at Charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

Dialogue: The Peppered Moth Case is NOT Evolution, it’s Devolution

The Peppered Moth case presents a great opportunity to dialogue with believers in Evolution. I have been confronted with the Peppered Moth case many times in my seminars and workshops. This dialogue, taken from my book “Without 3 Miracles, Darwin’s Dead” (Publication 4/17) goes like this:

Questioner: “Mr. Liebert, teaching my biology class the textbook uses the case of the Peppered Moth in England as an example of Evolution in action. Doesn’t this example prove Evolution and, therefore, make your arguments for Creation wrong?”

Me: “Tell me exactly what the text says about this moth case.”

Questioner, reading: “’The peppered moth in England is an excellent example of Evolution in action. It shows the operation of Natural Selection in a dramatic way in a small amount of evolutionary time, less than one hundred years.’ Darwin wrote in the Origin of Species that survival of the fittest was an important part of this theory. Do you deny this proves Evolution is right and Creation wrong?”

Me: “Let me restate the case. We start with two varieties of moth, light and dark and as time progresses one kind survives better based on the coloration of the local trees. If the tree bark is light in color as the natural trees, the light ones survive. If the trees are darkened by soot from burning coal, the dark ones survive more. Is that the case?”

Ask them agree.

Me: “OK. Did anything new come out of this process, any new genes or new variation?”

Questioner: “No, this is an example of Darwin’s “survival of the fittest.” Nothing new has been added to the moth species; its population balance is just changing by Natural Selection.”

Me: “Now, let’s review the Peppered Moth case we’ve agreed to. There are two varieties of moth, light and dark. One or the other is being driven toward extinction because of changing environmental conditions based on the color of the tree trunks. So, we are losing some genetic variety as the process proceeds. If one or the other becomes extinct, the type and its genetic variety will be lost and cannot be recovered. In your case, both kinds of moths exist from the beginning so nothing new has been added but there has been a change in the balance of who survives and who gets eaten. This whole case is a downhill process, the opposite of Evolution.”

He/She starts to argue but sees the futility of their position and eventually agrees.

Me: “We both agree the evolutionary process moves from the simple to complex, molecules to man, from single-celled to complex multi-celled creatures but this process moves in the opposite direction. We are losing diversity if one color disappears and this is the opposite of Evolution. It’s Devolution. Creationists agree Natural Selection is a real process in nature but it does not increase information and in this case, it decreases the diversity of the creature. This case shows the impossibility of Evolution, not its upward progress. To make your case for Evolution you’ve got to show the appearance of new traits in the population not the disappearance of ones that already exist.”

peppered-moth

Charlie is the author of “Always Be Ready to Give an Answer!” which develops an evangelism strategy that gets to the Gospel every time you witness. His second book ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You.” contains answers to more than 100 questions skeptics use to try to stump Christians. My third book, “Without 3 Miracles Darwin’s DEAD!” is currently in the final editing process and will be published later this year. http://yourchristiananswers.com

To get my weekly blog “like” my Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

Contact Charlie at Charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

Evolution Wastes Valuable Resources That Could Be Working to Cure Diseases

blog-41

Since Evolution’s not true spending any millions of dollars on Evolution promotion and research every year is a complete waste including time, money, scientific talent, precious laboratory space, and many others resources. If these resources were used for research that is beneficial to humankind, we would advance faster in things like curing disease and wipe out human suffering in many ways. All these resources spent on promotion of Evolution and research has NO benefit to humankind. To illustrate this terrible waste, I’ll give two examples: The National Science Foundation Website and GoLife Studies.

First, The National Science Foundation, funded by US tax dollars, maintains an interactive website titled: Evolution of Evolution -150 Years of Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species.” This site is very slick and sophisticated. Besides promoting Darwin himself, it covers the scientific areas of Anthropology, Astronomy, Biology, Geosciences, and Polar Sciences. This site is periodically updated with new material. It is especially attractive to computer literate youth and is pure Evolution indoctrination. They mix real operational science with Evolutionary conclusions to show they are related and MUST be accepted together which is pure propaganda and has no basis in real science. This website approach can be very convincing to a young student or a person with little understanding of science. The site is tax-funded indoctrination of a scientific model of the past that only half the US population supports. It is a complete waste!

My second example is a series of government-financed projects that have no redeeming value. They contribute NOTHING to the growth of useful scientific knowledge to improve humankind. The NSF funds these studies under the umbrella of Genealogy of Life Program “GoLife Studies.” They are designed solely to develop the Evolutionary “Tree of Life.” The Evolutionary Tree of Like does NOT exist and research to assemble it has no scientific value. Here is a sample list of some of these projects.

Assembling the Annelid (worms) Tree of Life

Assembling the Echinoderm (plants) Tree of Life (4 projects)

Assembling the Green Algal (water algae) Tree of Life (3 projects)

Automated and community-driven synthesis of the tree of life (2 projects)

Assembling the Phylogeny of the Monocots (plants)

Assembling the Pleurocarp (moss) Tree of Life

The Porifera (sponges) Tree of Life

The Zygomycetes (fungus) Genealogy of Life – The conundrum of Kingdom Fungi

Untangling the Deep Genealogy of Microbial Dark Matter

I didn’t find any projects that relate to anything that could potentially help humans. The work classifies into the “Tree of Life” things like moss, worms, algae, fungus, sharks, sponges, etc. In 2014 this program had 72 open projects at the cost of slightly more than $47 million. In the last paragraph of their project summary, they state their intention to indoctrinate students as part of the research! Here, the government is financing research with no value.

These are just two examples of many resources wasted on promotion or research that could be used for work much more beneficial to humankind. It’s not just the cost and lost assets; there is also a significant amount of intellectual talent wasted too.

This blog is from my third book, now in the review process, titled “Without 3 Miracles, Darwin’s Dead!” My first book Always Be Ready to Give an Answer! teaches an evangelism strategy for Christians who have difficulty witnessing because of the questions unbelievers ask. My second book ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You.” contains answers to 106 of those questions, http://yourchristiananswers.com

To get my weekly blog “like” my Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

Contact Charlie at Charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

Peppered Moth Case Falsifies Evolution.

peppered-mothFrom 1953-56 in Birmingham, England, Bernard Kettlewell investigated Peppered Moth adaptation. There were two varieties of the same moth species, light, and dark type. In clean environments, the light-colored moth had active camouflage when landing on tree trunks. The dark colored were seen less in polluted environments where trees are darkened by atmospheric soot. Kettlewell proposed selective survival because birds could easily catch dark moths on clean trees, and light moths on blackened trees. This Peppered Moth story appeared in many texts as an example of Darwinian Evolution’s Natural Selection.

Later scientists revisited Kettlewell’s experiments and found some fraudulent aspects to his claims. First, the moths aren’t active during the day but rest in treetops. Second, birds cannot easily feed on them because they are active at night. Third, the pictures used in texts were dead moths glued on trees. When Evolutionists are confronted with the origin of the photos they’ve claimed, it’s standard practice to use dead insects to get better pictures. That may be true, but Kettlewell put them on the tree trunks where they DON’T land, which is deceptive.

I have been confronted many times by questioners in Q&A sessions claiming that the Peppered Moth case proves Evolution. The dialogue frequently goes like this:

Challenger: “Mr. Liebert, when I teach, my high school/college biology class the textbook shows the Peppered Moth as a proof of Evolution. The text says: “The peppered moth in England is an excellent example of Evolution in action. It shows the operation of Natural Selection in a dramatic way in a short amount of evolutionary time.” Darwin wrote in the “Origin of Species” that Natural Selection, “survival of the fittest” was an important part of this theory. Doesn’t this prove Evolution is right and Creation wrong?”

Charlie: “We start with two varieties of moth, light and dark and as time progresses one kind survives better based on the coloration of trees. If the bark is light, in the natural trees, the light ones survive. When trees are darkened by soot, more dark ones survive. Is that the case?”

Challenger: “Yes.”

Charlie: “OK. Did anything new come out of this process, any new genes or new variation?”

Challenger: “No, this is an example of Natural Selection changing the balance between the two varieties.”

Charlie: “ tThere are two types light, and dark, and one or the other is moving toward extinction because of changing environmental conditions based on the color of the tree trunks. We are losing genetic variety as the process proceeds. If one or the other becomes extinct, that type and its genetic variety will be lost and is not recoverable. Both kinds of moths existed at the beginning of observation, so there’s nothing new added. There has just been a change in the balance of who survives or who gets eaten. This whole case of Natural Selection is a downhill process, the opposite of Evolution. Two kinds exist at the beginning. One kind is moving toward extinction. That’s loss, not gain! I call that Devolution. Evolution is contradicted by this process not proven by it.”

This blog from my book ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You.”   Charlie is also the author of Always Be Ready to Give an Answer! http://yourchristiananswers.com

To get my weekly blog “like” my Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

Contact Charlie at Charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

Evolution, Eugenics and Racism, 3 Evil Peas in a Pod. Abortion is Racism!

Evolution, Eugenics and Racism are all linked together in a common thread that destroys life in may ways, from death camps to legal abortion. The pattern is simple the “state” simply declares one group of people not legally protected as human, Jews in Germany, slaves and the unborn in the US. Eugenics, based on Evolution “is the study of the agencies under social control, that improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations either physically or mentally.” There was a large “eugenics” movement, partially led my Margaret Sanger, in America until WW II began.

“A direct line runs from Darwin, through the father of the eugenics movement—Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton—to the extermination camps of Nazi Europe.” Eugenics rooted in German philosophy in 20s gave rise to the propagation of racism during the rise of Nazism in Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

For example: from the Nuremberg (Germany) Laws on Citizenship and Race, September 15, 1935. ARTICLE 4. (1) A Jew cannot be a citizen of the Reich. He cannot exercise the right to vote; he cannot hold public office. (2) Jewish officials will be retired as of December 31, 1935.

Here are some quotes from articles of that time (citations are in my book). “In 1936 the German Supreme Court ‘refused to recognize Jews living in Germany as ‘persons’ in the legal sense.’” “Jews have an inborn character that makes them a ‘slave race’ while the Germans, or Aryans, were the ‘Master race.’” “The Jews are a mongrel race.” “The Jews are inferior and depraved … the duty of the Nordic people is to exterminate such parasitic races as we exterminate snakes and beasts of prey.”

This Racism based on Eugenics and Evolution would result in the Holocaust. The US was not much better in the past. The US Supreme Court in 1857 ruled in Dred Scott v. Sandford “that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves, or their descendants—whether or not they were slaves—were not legal persons and could never be citizens of the United States.” It was a 7–2 decision.

In the US today we have declared the unborn “non-persons and murder them with impunity. In 1973, the United States Supreme Court declared, “The word ‘person’ as used in the 14th Amendment, does not include the unborn.” The Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade (1973) resulted in a landmark decision regarding abortion. The court found that laws against abortion in the United States violated a constitutional right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This overturned all state and federal laws outlawing or restricting abortion and proclaimed unrestricted abortion legal nationwide. Parents NOTE: Abortion is the only surgical procedure that can be done on your child without your permission. Did you get that? Your child’s child may be murdered without you consenting or even knowing!

Lesson: Evolution is a source of the pseudoscience of Eugenics that promotes Racism. The US participates today by murdering the unborn based on a “non-person” designation.

NOTE:  This material is from my book ANSWERS For ”The Hope That Is In You” Get your copy at http://yourchristiananswers.com

To get my weekly blog “like” my Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

My Amazon Authors page http://amazon.com/author/charlieliebert

LinkedIn Author page https://www.linkedin.com/today/author/charlie-liebert-30b3195

Contact Charlie at charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

What you believe about where you came from makes a BIG difference in how you live and die.

“Where did we come from?” “Does it matter what I believe about my origin?” “Is society impacted by the origins debate?” The way people answer these and similar questions is important because of the society. A person’s values spring from these answers, creating a set of presuppositions that influences all their thinking. Here are two sets of presuppositions to compare, one Christian/Creationist and the other Atheistic/Evolutionist.

If I believe: I am created in God’s image, corrupted by sin but redeemed by grace, and then I have a hopeful future because I trust in Christ alone. If God is Creator, then: the Universe contains absolutes in both science and morality. My salvation and future are secure by faith in Christ. Acts 16:31: “And they (Paul and Silas) said, ‘Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved…’” Romans 10:9: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” Romans 10:13: “For ‘everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’” The Bible has many more verses that promise security through faith in Christ. What we believe directly affects how we behave, and our behavior impacts people and culture around us. Faith in Christ produces moral behavior based on the truths of Scripture.

If I believe: I came from dirt and will go back to dirt when I die, then: when life ends it had no meaning, and I have no hope for a future beyond the grave. If the universe is random, then: it contains no moral absolutes, and all rules can be created by human opinion. People who believe in “dirt to dirt” often despair to death by committing suicide. The logical outworking of “dirt to dirt” is hopelessness, frustration, and, ultimately, death, because all people die! No one escapes this life alive! When we teach our children, as our public education system does, that they came from dirt, are going to dirt, and life has no meaning, how can you expect moral behavior? How can they have hope in the future that ends in annihilation? You’re just a sophisticated animal evolved from pond scum. They behave like the animals they are told they are. They believe “Live for today, for tomorrow we die!”

How this worldview plays out in individual lives is demonstrated in the life of Ernest Hemingway and his family. He Society’s prominent humanists of the past, and his writings reflect that worldview. He committed suicide at the age of sixty-one. In his family, his father, Clarence Hemingway, his siblings Ursula and Leicester, and later his granddaughter Margaux Hemingway all also committed suicide. Worldview makes a difference in how dual and societal disaster.

Lesson: The Christian hope for t. Life has meaning and purpose. “To live is Christ!” The Humanist view ends in nothing. Life has no meaning and is full of hopelessness and frustration.

This blog is adapted from pages xvii-xix in “ANSWERS For “The Hope That Is In You.” Charlie is also the author of Always Be Ready to Give an Answer! Get your copies at http://yourchristiananswers.com

To get my weekly blog “like” my Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel

To get video, answers to questions go to http://www.sixdaycreation.com

My Amazon Authors page http://amazon.com/author/charlieliebert

Contact Charlie at charlie@sixdaycreation.com or 336-337-4975 (call or text).

How could ALL the diversity of mankind come from two individuals?

In this BLOG we deal with Adam and Eve’s diversity of children to show how all mankind came from two individuals. To answer this question we must first understand genetics and dog breeding is a good place to begin. Both creationists and evolutionists agree all the variety of dogs today came from an original pair, something like wolves. That pair of had the genetic diversity of all dogs since these two are the only original source.

In DNA, genes come in pairs, and have two types, dominant and recessive. Dominant genes are written as capital letters (A, B, C, D), and recessive as lowercase (a, b, c, d). The original pair had one of each kind in every gene pair so they could create all the possible varieties that exist (Aa, Bb, Cc, Dd). Each parent contributes one gene to each offspring, so the possibilities for Aa in both parents: AA, aA, Aa and aa. If a pair got isolated and their genes for both male and female were, for example, AA and bb, the offspring can only be Ab. This is what we call genetic depletion. For this AA and bb pair, the genetic varieties that were lost are: aa, Aa, BB, and Bb. Only if a procreator with “a” or “B” genes enters can the diversity be restored. This is what the breeders do when they produce a new pedigree, however this restrictive breeding brings weakness to the offspring as the genes become less diverse. Pedigreed animals often have many more health problems because of this genetic depletion. The mutt that eats the “garbage in the gutter” that you find at the pound has genetic strength. Otherwise it would not survive. Your pedigreed poodle with more than one hundred documented genetic mistakes, if you release it to the wild, would die off quickly.

Adam and Eve as the parents of all humankind, would have this “Aa, Bb, Cc” genetics. Their children would have had very diverse appearances. For example, their skin colors would have been from the darkest black to the lightest light in the first generation. This makes the Bible’s position on race clear. There is one race, descended from Adam and Eve: the human race.

Racism is based on the evolutionary construct that different tribes and nations were ranked according to their descended distances from their so-called “ape” ancestors. This ranking made some races superior to others. NOTE: look up “white man’s burden” on the web. The secondary title of Darwin’s The Origin of the Species is: “On the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life”. Based on Darwin’s writings, the science of eugenics developed, which ranked the superiority or inferiority of the various races. The closest to the ape, according to Darwin and other eugenicists, were the aboriginal and Negro races. This was used a justification for slavery. Racism is supported by Evolution. More on races in a later blog.

Lesson: Based on our scientific understanding of genetics mankind did come from two individuals, Adam and Eve. The concept of racial superiority or inferiority comes from the Theory of Evolution.

See the Chapter 12, pages 190-208 in ANSWERS For: “The Hope That Is In You.” in the section titled “Racism’s Evolution Connection” for more discussion of races.

To get my blog notice every week “like” my Facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/Charlie-Liebert-1603534356575541/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel